Fidel Castro’s nearly forty-nine year tenure as Cuba’s de facto and constitutional head of state and government may finally be drawing to a close. National Assembly president Ricardo Alarcon told reporters in Quito in October that Castro may not “be available” to serve another five- year term as president of the Council of State.

Occupying that office since it was created in 1976 under Cuba’s new socialist constitution, Castro has served as head of state while simultaneously presiding as head of government in the role of president of the council of ministers. But to be re-elected for another five-year term he would first have to be chosen as a provincial delegate in regime-controlled elections. Last week Raul Castro issued a cursory announcement that delegates to the provincial assemblies and deputies to the national assembly will be chosen on January 20, 2008. Alarcon seems to be suggesting that Castro will not be a candidate that day, and therefore will be ineligible to continue next year as Cuba’s president.

The assembly president’s remarks stand in sharp contrast to what he has said in the past. Last March, for example, he told a wire service reporter that Castro will be “in perfect shape to run for re-election. I would nominate him. I am sure he will be in perfect shape to continue handling his responsibilities.” This suggests that between March and October Castro’s health, and perhaps his cognitive abilities, have further deteriorated. That would be consistent with rumors that he underwent another life-threatening surgery during the period. Castro has not appeared in public in sixteen months and his most recent taped television interview with a Cuban reporter several months ago revealed him in an obviously handicapped state.

A second ranking official also commented recently on Castro’s prospects. Communist Party Politburo member, Abel Prieto, who, unlike Alarcon is not an authorized or practiced commentator on the subject, suggested to an AP reporter on September 12 that Castro might decide to bow out because of his failing health. “I don’t know what he would say about the state of his health, and I think it depends a lot on that.” But Prieto added an intriguing twist. He proposed that Castro first “would have to convince the people not to be re-elected.”

A third Cuban leader, the most prestigious and influential of them all except for Raul Castro himself, has also recently provided some meaningful clues on the subject. On November 8, while representing Cuba at an Ibero-American summit in Chile, vice president Carlos Lage remarked on the role Castro currently plays in Cuban affairs. "He is working, working hard, every day more," Lage said. "I'd say he's reading, studying, analyzing, offering ideas, thoughts, giving us ideas. . ." There was not a word about Castro participating in decision making, consulting or being briefed by other officials, or preparing to reassume any such responsibilities.

Asked whether Castro would resume presidential power, Lage replied evasively. "He's already assuming tasks, perhaps the most important one a chief of state can have, which is seeding consciousness." All of this, from three of Cuba’s senior leaders, seems to indicate that Castro has assumed an emeritus role in the leadership and suggests too that by next spring or summer he will no longer be Cuba’s president, though he may be granted some new honorific title instead.

But all this begs the tantalizing question raised by Prieto: exactly how will Castro’s final, irrevocable abdication be orchestrated and explained? Prieto may have meant that, if he is able to, Castro would want to inform the Cuban people in another televised interview, or one or more of his reflections, of his decision to retire. Prieto probably does not really believe the populace is anxious for Castro to return. The reality, as he must appreciate, is quite the opposite. Anecdotal and other evidence indicates that Cubans generally, like most in the leadership class, by now have moved on, accepting –even finding genuine relief—in what is overwhelmingly viewed on the island as the eclipse of the fidelista era.

So perhaps Prieto was referring to Fidel himself. Will he willingly step aside? Is he mentally and emotionally competent to make that decision? Might his physical condition be so precarious that the exercise of any real leadership responsibilities could actually be fatal? Have his wife and children, and possibly other relatives in the huge Castro clan, weighed in urging him to withdraw? Might they, as has been rumored on the island, be counseling Raul and his closest associates to discourage Fidel from any thought of returning?

Most students of his leadership performance could never have imagined that an alive and aware Fidel Castro could voluntarily yield power. But perhaps now, after so many months out of the limelight, out of uniform and out of character, wearing a ridiculous red jogging outfit, not having been seen walking, striding, or standing in his accustomed pose before a speaker’s lectern, he has grudgingly accepted the inevitable.

Yet it may be just as likely that this titanic, narcissistic, unyielding potentate may have to have the power he has craved since the early 1950s wrenched out from under him. Only Raul Castro could do that, and at this point in his brother’s decline, and as troubles and dissatisfaction on the island multiply, the defense minister and acting president may realize that he will soon have no alternative but to do so.


I wish to acknowledge the valuable assistance provided by Vanessa Lopez, my University of Miami student research assistant, in the preparation of this report.


Dr. Brian Latell, distinguished Cuba analyst and recent author of the book, After Fidel: The Inside Story of Castro’s Regime and Cuba’s Next Leader, is a Senior Research Associate at ICCAS. He has informed American and foreign presidents, cabinet members, and legislators about Cuba and Fidel Castro in a number of capacities. He served in the early 1990s as National Intelligence Officer for Latin America at the Central Intelligence Agency and taught at Georgetown University for a quarter century. Dr. Latell has written, lectured, and consulted extensively.

The Latell Report November 2007      
Welcome to The Latell Report. The Report, analyzing Cuba's contemporary domestic and foreign policy, is published monthly except August and December and distributed by the electronic information service of the Cuba Transition Project (CTP) at the University of Miami's Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies (ICCAS).

The CTP, funded by a grant from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), can be contacted at P.O. Box 248174, Coral Gables, Florida 33124-3010, Tel: 305-284-CUBA (2822), Fax: 305-284-4875, and by email at


¿Bienvenido Mr. Putin?
Elías Amor
  ( Una de las películas del gran Berlanga con la que más disfruto es “Bienvenido Mr. Marshall”. En plena dictadura franquista, una película en clave de humor, dejaba entrever muchas de las circunstancias de aquella España atribulada por los años de la autarquía económica, la miseria y pobreza. Si uno cierra los ojos y se traslada en el tiempo, aquella película podría reflejar, con bastante exactitud, el drama actual que se vive en Cuba. Una sociedad destruida, con una economía ineficiente e improductiva, que se agarra a cualquier tronco que flote con tal de no hundirse para siempre.
La familia liberal: amigos y enemigos
Carlos Alberto Montaner
Escritor, periodista y político
  ( Sin embargo, y aquí radica el núcleo de estas reflexiones, hay miles de chilenos destruyendo metódicamente las expresiones materiales de la formidable transformación chilena. ¿Por qué sucede este fenómeno absurdo de autofagia? ¿Por qué miles de jóvenes chilenos atentan contra su propio bienestar? Las diferencias fundamentales e insalvables, son las que se tienen con los autoritarios, ya sean francamente totalitarios, como los comunistas y fascistas, o lo que hoy se denominan “democracias iliberales”.  
Naciones Unidas finalmente certifica y reprocha a Cuba la desaparación forzosa de Ferrer
Prisoners Defenders
  ( EXCLUSIVA: El Comité Contra las Desapariciones Forzosas de las Naciones Unidas, tras haber dado derecho de réplica al Estado y escuchar todas las alegaciones en un proceso transparente, concluye en una carta enviada a Cuba el día 27 de enero de 2020 y remitida a Prisoners Defenders, que los familiares de José Daniel Ferrer “no conocieron el paradero del señor José Daniel Ferrer sino hasta el 7 de noviembre de 2019, treinta y siete días después de su detención”. También le instan a que Cuba “tiene la obligación de proceder sin demora a realizar una investigación exhaustiva e imparcial sobre las circunstancias de la desaparición del señor José Daniel Ferrer en los días en los que se le ha mantenido en detención sin contacto con el exterior.” Esta certificación, junto al proceso arbitrario, difamatorio y lleno de contradicciones que ha llevado a la condena mundial del caso, ponen en grave riesgo la imagen mundial de Cuba esta vez incluso ante la izquierda.
El fracaso de la formación y educación profesional en Cuba
Elías Amor
  ( La mayor parte de las empresas extranjeras que acuden a Cuba interesándose en hacer negocios coinciden en que existen importantes problemas de cualificación profesional de los trabajadores. Los cubanos han logrado alcanzar un alto nivel educativo, esto es incuestionable. Pero sus competencias, habilidades y destrezas para el desempeño en el mundo laboral, al menos en Cuba, son escasas, prácticamente inexistentes, y lo que es peor, rara vez se ponen en valor por el sistema económico y productivo existente en el país. Esto es interesante.
Suscripciones a Misceláneas de Cuba
Edición electrónica
Suscríbase para adquirir la revista
Envíe colaboraciones digitales a:
Misceláneas de Cuba autoriza la reproducción de los textos aparecidos en su página digital y su revista impresa siempre y cuando se les indiquen como fuente.
Misceláneas de Cuba no comparte necesaria-mente las ideas vertidas en los artículos firmados, las cuales son responsabilidad de sus respectivos autores. La línea editorial de esta publicación quedó recogida en el artículo de fondo de su edición fundacional Pasando Revista a las Razones de la Revista.